Marriage and Money: How to Split Up the Money and Bills

Here's an article from financial writer Michelle Singletary that gives her thoughts on joint versus separate accounts in marriages. There are several good comments in this piece, and I want to highlight two of them, starting with this:

In a marriage, I think each person should have an allocated amount of money he or she can spend, no questions asked. No judgment.

This is what we do and it works like a charm. We each have "personal" funds that we can spend as we like with no input, comment or argument. I use my fund to splurge on cycling-related items. For those of you who often have quarrels with your spouse when you want to make a personal purchase, I suggest you try budgeting for this sort of spending. It really does work well.

Here's Michelle's second thought:

When you get married, it is not about you anymore. Mine becomes ours.

"One of the beautiful things about being in a marriage is that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. One plus one can equal more than two."

You want financial peace in your house? Accept that the day you get married is the day you stop being financially independent.

In this day of "yours", "mine", separate checking and investment accounts, and the like, I know this line of thinking is not popular, but it's one I support as well. We don't separate our accounts other than a few that are owned by one or the other of us alone for estate planning purposes. Other than that, everything's together. It makes things easier (fewer accounts to manage) and is just one more way our lives are tied together. I couldn't see it differently nor would I have it any other way.

Comments

[Terry]

I can share how we do it...and I think it works quite well.

All of the earnings go in our "master account" – granted my wife stays home with the kids. This account is used to pay all the bills. Each of us has our own account (free checking of course). We each get an allowance every month we can use for whatever purpose we want - no questions asked.

If I get a good bonus - we will sit down and decide together what "bonus" we give ourselves - provided we are on budget elsewhere.

I like the concept of having the individual accounts because:

#1 My wife keeps her check book balanced herself. She does not have to come to me every time she writes a check and makes sure it is written down. If she had to do this, she would feel like I was keeping up with what she is spending it on.
#2 The money is less likely to get spent on things like kid items or other things covered in the budget elsewhere. I really have to push my wife into spending on herself sometimes – hey – she deserves it!
#3 It allows her to save her money up month after month if she wants to buy something big. She has complete control of the balance and doesn’t have to ask me how much she can spend.

I hear many couples talk about how they each pay certain bills – and after that they can spend the rest how they want. Hey – you earned it, you should spend it the way you want, right? Well – that sure doesn’t sound like a JOINT marriage to me.

[abileneblues]

The separate thing would have never worked for us. We now use an envelope system. We each have an amount for clothing and allowance and can be spent as we please. Other than that, we have a single checking account for the bills and anybody in the family has access to the envelopes (the kids have their own envelope systems). This system has probably produced more financial peace between my wife and I than paying off debt or anything. The only "nagging" about spending is an occasional reminder to the kids that if they spend all their clothing/makeup budget on entertainment, we will not bail them out and buy them clothes. It's been working for two years now and the money stuff gets easier all the time.

I agree with Terry on the "joint marriage" issue, but I have friends for whom that very system has worked for many years. Whatever floats their boat. It's just not the way I want to conduct my joint marriage.

[J.D. @ Get Rich Slowly]

My wife and I have been married for thirteen years, and together for eighteen. We've never had a joint account. (That is until we bought out current house two years ago -- we now have a joint emergency account for the house. It's an old house, and has many problems, and this works well.)

This quote, in particular, really bugs me:

You want financial peace in your house? Accept that the day you get married is the day you stop being financially independent.

Singletary is implying that you can't have a successful marriage if you choose to keep separate finances. This is ignorant and dogmatic.

Though my wife and I keep our finances separate, we've never had a problem with money. We've never had a fight about money. Neither of us resents this situation. It makes perfect sense to us. I buy my stuff, she buys her stuff, and we split the cost on joint stuff. It's just as much a "joint marriage" as those with shared finances.

With many financial decisions, there's no right way or wrong way to do things. There are options, and your job is to pick the one that makes the most sense to you.

[claire]

I think the bottom line is that everybody's different, and every relationship is different. What works for some people doesn't work for others. My partner and I have some combined resources and some separate resources. We do occasionally squabble about money, but I think we would anyway even if everything was 100% combined or 100% separate.

This question of whether money in marriages and LTRs should be combined or not seems to come up in the PF blog world once a month or so. There's always somebody (who has combined finances with their spouse) who implies that it's not a true marriage or a true partnership unless you share everything. That may be true for some people. Some people may not feel totally committed or "joined" unless all their eggs are in the same basket. Well, bully for them, but why they think their way works for everybody I just don't know.

[S.B.]

Well my husband and I are one of those couples that split everything. Right down the middle. I can tell you that after 5 years, I'm am completely unhappy with the situation.

I am my husbands second wife and since they tried the joint thing in his first marriage, he doesn't want to do it in ours. Problem was with their marriage... He would ask her to pay certain bills and she would spend the money on other things. I know this is more of a trust issue then anything, but it stresses me out.

My main issue is that my husband makes a lot more then I do. So when we split things down the middle, then he keeps his earning and I keep mine, it just seems unjust.

We are working through these issues right now but I do not recommend that other couples try it. It is suppose to be a JOINT effort and the way this system is done, there's nothing JOINT about it.

[Sandra]

I agee with S.B. Marriage is a Covenant between two people. I've been married for four (4) years and I'm very unhappy. Right now we're trying the 50/50 approach and it's not working!!! My husband makes $60K a year and i make $35K a year. Splitting the bills 50/50 isn't fair to me. I can't match him dollar-for-dollar. Some months when the rent is due, car insurance is due,school tuition is due, etc.. i don't have enough money. I can't ask him for help b/c that'll take him over 50%. That wouldn't be fair to him, right?

[Mike]

Sandra,

I agree and disagree - I've for the most part have taken care of my girlfriend and child for the past 3yrs - by myself - with some random money input from my S/O - Now she has a job and has gotten a credit card etc, and I'm still recovering from job loss and getting caught up and I can barely get a dime from her without questioning or the whole "well i aint gonna run up my CC" When I need things, like car repairs (which it's our only car) and am recovering. So I think that 50/50 is a good choice, less stress when they cant repay the favors you for them. Why should I give 60% if I cant get 10% back when I need it? Just seems illogical to me. -- just to mention when she has had money she has helped me before, but for jointed things - nothing that I havent helped her with before, and now I need some help I cant get none -- I think very unfair. However, I'll make it; I'll just cut her off down to 50% now, and we're good to go.

[Jeanne]

My husband and I are newlyweds and I make 31k a year and he makes 37k so we have just been splitting everything except entertainment and rent which he pays a little more for. However he has finished his post doctoral and will be making 75k a year at his new job. I will unfortunatly still be making 31k. So I have done a little research to find the most fair way to settle our finances and I am going to suggest we each put 2/3 of our paycheck into a joint account that goes towards all bills, vacations, and emergencies. I feel very comforable with this situation because in the end we will be saving a ton of money in our joint account and we will still have enough each week to spend on our own personal things. I will not and cannot go 50/50 with him. I think that's horrible for a spouse to do if they are making double what you are.

[FMF]

Jeanne --

How about putting it all in one pile, paying the bills, and dividing what's left equally?

[Anita]

My partner and I have been together now for 7 years. I am happy about everything except for one thing. He sold his house and put a large sum down on the one we live in now. He believes from now on, I just make the rest of the house payments until the house is paid off. I also pay the largest amount of our living expenses as well, food etc. He makes more money than I. We did have wills made up in case one or the other dies, so I am grateful for that. But I dont know if this 50/50 arrangment is right.

[linda]

I've been married for almost 7 years, and for the past 3, my husband and I have split shared finances 50:50. this was a result of our bad experiences sharing finances, and I felt like he was spending and committing to more because of my income and I was doing without alot. Now I do make 2x as much as him. However, he has done great paying for 1/2, however I find myself getting resentful when scheduling vacations or home improvements because he never offers to pay. I hear the point of view that it isn't fair to split finances 50:50 when one spouse make so much more, but what about considering the level of hard work it takes to get to that place of higher earnings. I mean if you look at our experiences side by side, he could be making more if he wanted to. I chose to work hard and excel in highschool so that I could get into an IVY league college. He goofed off in highschool and therfore wasn't college prepared and went tot he military. I again struggled to pay and excel at college, where my husband ended up at a not very competitive college. I was able to get into an IVY league grad school, where i still am paying an enourmous school loan debt from. My husband didn't choose that path. So my point is, our lives are reflections of choices we make. I put in alot of hard work and $'s towards where I am without help, so I should be entitiled to enjoy my salary. again, I think if he knew how difficult it was for me to get to where I was, he wouldn't want to spend a dime of my money. Instead, i think he feels entitled as my husband and is too accepting of his position as a lower wage earning spouse. And I just have higher expectations for him, even if he doesn't. Am I wrong?

[derder]

I would just like to throw something into this conversation. I developed a disabling illness
in the course of this 25 year marriage.
My husband is the type that keeps his finances separate (luckily the law sees it differently).
While he makes over $100,000 per year,
I have to pay for my food, medical expenses and clothes with disability and what little I make while
returning to work; having had to make drastic changes in how I accomplish my work. (Note I have two college degrees - 8 years). I now can barely cover my basic needs.
In contrast, I know healthy women that eat, dress, vacation, buy second homes, and put their kids through college (even go to college themselves) all on their husbands salaries.
Once a severe life altering illness is thrown
into the picture your perspective changes.
How much do you REALLY love each other?
Would that person be there for you in times
of need?
I wish I had spent more time finding out
where my husbands loyalties were - to his finances
it turns out. So, I think the true discussion
is what is the need for marriage if you
truly do not love and care for each other?

PS I also know women that make more money
than their husbands but they put all of the money
in one pot and consider it "ours."

[Joann]

My partner and I split our bills based on the ratio of what we contribute to our total income. She makes 40% and I make 60% of our total income. Therefore, she pays 40% of the bills and I pay 60%. While we both feel we have 50/50 ownership of assets, we disagree on how we should liquidate assets we have purhcased together. I say that I should get 60% because that is what I contributed and she says it should 50/50. She will always gain 10% and I will always lose 10% of what we orignally paid.

[anon]

what bothers me is that we both work and he wants us to each contribute abot 2/3 of our salaries but at the same time i have to take care of the children 100%, take care of the house and chores. im not happy and feel a bit used.

In this economy, it's a practical matter - stay together because 2 can live cheaper than 1.