Is Going Back to College Worth It? (Are MBAs Worth It?)
In Experience versus Education: Which Counts More in Career Success?, I talked about which of the two made the most difference in a person's career. As we all have discussed this issue through several posts, I think the general consensus is the following:
An education (degree) is often needed to open the door and get a good first job. The degree might also be important for later job opportunities, but generally the importance of the degree becomes less and less as a person's career advances -- and work experience becomes more and more important. In many cases, work experience eventually dwarfs education in importance later on in a person's career.
I realize that the above statement is very general and while it applies to most circumstances (at least in my opinion), there are tons of exceptions.
And here's a piece from Kiplinger that details the case against going back to school -- in this case, he highlights the MBA and how there's little need for it. His rationale:
- Rather than learning what you need, you're buried under mountains of information, most of which you'll never use, and the rest of which you'll probably long have forgotten -- or it will have become obsolete by the time you need it.
- You're often taught in a lecture class (the least effective way to learn,) or in a discussion section, in which you endure more professorial prattle punctuated by student comments often ignorant and/or designed more to impress than to edify.
- Worst of all, most professors are far less qualified than are master practitioners to help you prepare to be competent in your career. After all, they are people who deliberately opted out of the real world so they could study esoteric academic research questions. The more prestigious the institution, the more likely professors are to be hired, promoted, and tenured based on their research productivity, with little regard to whether they confuse or bore the pants off students.
Ha! This guy's singing my song!
I have to agree with him 100% on these. Grad school contained a ton of stuff I haven't used since, was full of meaningless discussions from people who didn't know how the real world worked (including me), and was taught by people who didn't understand the practicalities of American business. It was fairly worthless in preparing me for a career in business except for one thing -- it opened the door for me to get a job I could never have gotten otherwise (and certainly couldn't have gotten at age 24.) After that, my experience took over and my career took off. But I needed the MBA to get it started.
So what does he suggest you do instead of going back to school? He says you should enroll in "You U" -- a self-developed program where you:
- Have a mentor
- Read key articles and books
- Attend conferences
- Do apprenticeships alongside a master practitioner
By the way, I agree that each of these should be part of making the most of your career -- but you should be doing this whether or not you get another degree.
Anyway, the author suggests that you can open the doors that an MBA usually opens for you by writing a specific letter (included in the link above) that convinces employers that you've gone to You U and are a great hire. He claims the letter should be really effective:
I give talks to executives and often ask them, "Imagine you're an employer and you post a want ad that says 'MBA required.' and one applicant wrote this letter." I read the letter above to them. I then say, "Raise your hand if you'd interview him." Invariably, 80% to 90% do.
Ok, now who doesn't understand the real world?
First of all, would the executives even see the letter or would some HR intern weed it out since the guy didn't have an MBA? Second, would 80% to 90% REALLY interview him or are they just saying that in a bogus survey in an artificial environment? Third, an interview is not a job offer. It's far from it.
What do you think? Agree with the author? Agree with me? Something in between?





