I've written a lot on saving money by cutting cable TV and have suggested a variety of alternatives. You can cancel cable TV completely, save a ton by cutting back on it a bit, or look for alternatives to cable TV. I basically get four responses to these suggestions:
- "That's a great idea! I did it and saved a boatload."
- "Good suggestion. I should consider doing it."
- "It's my choice how I spend my money and cable is worth it to me."
- "Are you crazy? I couldn't live without cable TV!"
Of course, I'm fine with the first two responses. I also agree with the thought behind the third one. If we can't spend our money on the things we like, what's the purpose of saving in the first place? That said, people with the third and fourth responses need to consider this comment I got from a reader to my post titled Save Money by Canceling Your Cable:
I've spent a few years with the bang-up cable package, and the past few years with virtually no cable at all (I say virtually, because I have the minimum available cable package. Broadcast reception in my area is unreliable, so I basically pay the Cable Company $9/mo for guaranteed reception). I enjoyed having cable, and I liked a lot of the programming choices available, but the weirdest thing happens when you drop cable: Even though you liked it and spent a lot of time with it, you don't miss it.
Let's look at the last part of that last sentence again:
The weirdest thing happens when you drop cable: Even though you liked it and spent a lot of time with it, you don't miss it.
I haven't had this comment before, but if it's true, it could save a ton of money for a lot of people. How? Well, let me suggest a "test cancel." You cancel your cable for three months (enough time for you to get weaned off it and forget "how things used to be"), then see if you want to buy it again after that time. If the commenter is right (which I think he is for a good number of people), then many of you will have saved yourselves hundreds of dollars every year and will have found lots of extra time for family activities, hobbies, reading, and, of course, reading Free Money Finance. ;-)
i don't pay for cable.
i don't feel it worth it. in my area it costs at least around $40-50 without extras (i am not talking about getting the spare type for better reception on the free stations).
if i can get reception, then great. if i can't through my $40 antenna, then too bad. i don't want to PAY for bad tv; cable = more bad tv, more $.
i like one-time expenses. i do not like recurring ones. if you add it up for the year it's a lot of money!
Posted by: ib | October 02, 2006 at 01:44 PM
I also have the very most basic cable option. In fact it's not an option Comcast advertises, you have to ask for it. But for $12/mth I get 30 channels. Can't beat that.
Posted by: More Bread | October 02, 2006 at 01:53 PM
Been thinking about this for awhile myself.
Posted by: Argon | October 02, 2006 at 02:01 PM
I'm in the same boat as the commenter (can't get reception without cable, so I have the basic option). $14.50 for 26 channels isn't bad.
But I have to say that I *love* TV, and I *really* love good TV, and still miss not getting the cable networks with edgy dramas. Or, on the more noble side, the Discovery Channel suite with all of the informational programs. And when I get to the point that my other fixed expenses have dropped enough, getting expanded cable or [hushed, reverent tones] digital, I will get it and I will watch it.
Posted by: HC | October 02, 2006 at 02:10 PM
"dropped enough to let me get"
Where did that comma come from?
Posted by: HC | October 02, 2006 at 02:12 PM
Guess I'm in the fourth category. LOL I barely watch any local/network programming.
Posted by: J Martin | October 02, 2006 at 02:50 PM
I dropped cable TV, not only because of the price, but because is a huge time waste. There is always something "interesting" going on.
Instead, I subscribed to Netflix, 3 DVDs at a time. I see about 12 good movies/month, meaning that I waste only about 1 hour/day or less on "TV". Now I have time to read blogs, books and magazines, and I learn something new every day. Priceless!
Posted by: Ervin J | October 02, 2006 at 02:54 PM
Never had it, don't know that I ever will. Of course, my kids think I'm a curmudgeon ;-)
Posted by: Ron | October 02, 2006 at 03:15 PM
I haven't had cable for years and no I don't miss it. i get all the channels I would ever need with my rabbit ears and for the most part they come in clear. Dump cable there is nothing on anyway!
Posted by: | October 02, 2006 at 03:33 PM
I did drop cable for about 4 months. I had extended basic and it cost about $45/month. I have to admit it though, I did miss the local news and the Discovery channel. But I didn't miss the price! I now subscribe to basic cable at $14/month, and it comes with local channels and Discovery. I am willing to pay that because here in the Sierra foothills, we get no reception with an antenna.
Posted by: Brad | October 02, 2006 at 05:34 PM
I get free Cable. I have cable internet. Cancelled my cable TV - turns out my local provider can't provide cable internet and filter off TV so I still get it, just don't pay for it.
Posted by: Eaken | October 07, 2006 at 01:12 PM
I have DISH Network and don't want to trade it for any alternative. I pay a lot less than my friends with cable and I have new and innovative technology that cable doesn't offer. I have a Sling Adapter connected to my DVR so that I can watch my DVR's and live TV anywhere I go with my Smartphone where high-speed internet is available. I can literally travel the world with my TV in my pocket and pay nothing more for this featured quality on my monthly bill. I work for DISH so I know that the product here is well worth the reasonable cost.
Posted by: Nicole | January 29, 2011 at 01:00 AM