Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Almost Infinite Investment Return Revisited | Main | What do You Think About Mvelopes? »

October 25, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I keep on reading these articles, yet I really do not know how HSA's will controll costs long term? The premise is that when people spend their own money that they will control costs. Yet when "the top 10 percent of the most ill patients account for 69 percent of total health care payouts in America", why would these 10% control costs when they are covered by catastrophic insurance? Would they opt for a cheaper surgeon when they are already over their high deductible limit (and have no cost to them)?

Yes, consumers can control the costs of their routine check-ups and small procedures, yet if you look around, this is not the high costs items. So, if it is reduced, it may not be by much. And, for real emergencies, are you really going to ask the cost of the ER before the doctor stops the bleeding?

It is good for those who are healthy (if they remain healthy) who want cheaper insurance. And, the cost of insurance for those who are sick will go up because the cost is not offset by healthy people with lower costs. Unfortunately, we do not always know when we will be sick or healthy. Insurance is suppose to spread risks, not isolate them. Thus, I have not been a big fan of HSA as a long-term solution to health care costs for all.

If the premium is $200/month less for a single person, that's $2400/year which would more than pay the added deductable.

If true, that'd be great, particularly if my employer offered the plan and would kick the premium difference into my account.

HSAs are a great option for healthy people, but the Marotta essay veers into commentary on public health matters and lays too much blame at the foot of the traditional insurance industry. Insurance is all about risk pooling and one of the consequences of consumer driven health care is that it leaves more sick people in the traditional system. Given a short window of time it is easy to laud the benefits of the HSA program but in time some of today's healthy people will become sick and some of the benefits will be seen as an artificial balloon created by young and healthy plan members.

The indictment about 10% of the people taking up 69% of the costs is not surprising. I've also heard that half of all medical expenses occur in the last six months of life. Everyone thinks that is outrageous until they are hanging on by a thread.

I'm not sure how well HSAs will work to really bring down health care costs. For one, the funds they represent are a very small amount of health care.

For another, when you're spending on health care, you're often in an emotional state of mind, or perhaps you're truly ill. Can you imagine - your kid needs surgury, do you send her under the knife with CostCutters Health Care or with the well respected hospital down the street? You're having a heart attack, do you shop around for the best price on stints?

Of course, we can't let prices continue as they are now, but I don't see how the macro economics of HSAs will do much in this regard.

I am currently in an HSA/HDHP and think it is great. I pay my expenses from pocket and let the HSA money accumulate like and IRA. I don't agree with some of the ideas expressed by commenters above about how consumer choice can't affect health care costs. The reason so many costs are so high to begin with is because of the current system where the insurance pays and so no one looks at the cost. Compare surgical procedures covered by insurance compared to those not covered by insurance for an illustration. Lasik and plastic surgery are procedures not covered by insruance, and I'd bet the cost for them is going up less quickly than for hip replacements or angioplasties. The difference is that people look at their pocketbooks before getting plastic surgery or lasik, so providers have to hold the line on what they charge.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats