Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Fees Are Killing Your 401k | Main | Save Big Money by Talking About What You're Planning to Buy »

March 15, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thank You for posting this FMF. I'm sick of hearing about this argument. You said it well, "It's not that one investment is better than another -- it's which one is better in which situation -- that's the real question."

It's obvious that both are good investment options depending on the situation.

Thank you and hopefully this is the last we'll hear about this debate. (Sarcastic Tone)

Same was said in Bogleheads Guide to Investing ETF are good for lump sums

I was hoping to read about how Zecco.com might change the thinking. Presumably ETFs are good for lump sums because there are commissions involved with buying and selling. If commissions can be eliminated, then do they become the clear winner?

Is it even worth caring about if "winning" is such a minor difference?

"Is it even worth caring about if "winning" is such a minor difference?"

Maybe not. But if the difference is even a quarter of a percentage point -- it could be a big difference in the long run.

The problem with ETFs is that you usually have to pay a brokerage commission to reinvest dividends as there has been no way to make a direct purchase without going through a broker. Index funds permit dividend reinvestment without a fee.

If you have $100 / month to invest and you are using E-trade to buy ETFs at $12.99 per trade, that's a +13% expense ratio. If you have $1000 / month to invest and your commission is $8 at ScottTrade, that's down to .8%. So keep bumping the amount up and the commissions down and at some point, the ETF commissions+expense ratios match the index funds.

At this point, I'm doing more ETFs because I pay $0 commissions at Wells Fargo. This also lets me get into Vanguard "funds" that either are closed to new investors or have high minimums. For example, the Vanguard Energy Index fund has a requirement of $25K minimum while the Vanguard Energy ETF is just the share price + commission. I do have to wait until dividends and distributions build up enough to buy another whole share (as far as I can see, Wells Fargo does not have the DRIP option).

I still don't get it. Which one is better, ETFs or Index Funds?

Eric Haas has a good discussion of pros/cons of each on his website.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats