Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Giveaways Coming | Main | Gift-Giving Ideas Plus Thoughts on Holiday Tipping »

December 10, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Sigh, somehow I have trouble getting the people around me understand how small fees can add up to big sums.

They want to focus on the big returns, not the small fees. They don't understand that investment return is uncertain, but fees are certain to take a chunk.

How do you feel about ETFs tracking the same indices versus mutual funds?

Honest Dollar --

Do you mean ETFs versus index mutual funds?

Edmund, do you invest in emerging market funds? I haven't found any that come without sales charges. As you may know, Vanguard's emerging market index fund does have a purchase/sale redemption fee.

Yes, I meant ETFs versus index funds that track the same indices. So would you prefer to invest in an S&P 500 ETF or an S&P 500 index fund (or total market ETF vs. total market index fund, or MSCI EAFE ETF vs. MSCI EAFE index fund, etc.)?

Your post inspired me to do some number-crunching on VTI versus VTSMX, the two total market products from Vanguard. The difference is pretty negligible if the ETF trades aren't commission-free. But I wanted to see your thoughts on the whole ETF vs. index fund debate.

I'm going to have to go against the grain on this one. It seems that everyone in personal finance blogs loves index funds, particularly Vanguard. I don't want to put a super-long post on here, so I will give minimal info and anyone is welcome to contact me if they want more details.
I plugged the Vanguard 500 Index Fund into a Morningstar calculator and compared it to American Funds Growth Fund of America A shares. I did a $20,000 initial investment so that the highest sales charge is charged at American Funds. Investment made at common start date of August 31, 1976 ends with a total value on October 31, 2007 of:
Vanguard: $730,954 (12.24% annual return)
American Funds: $2,136,754 (16.17% annual return)
I'll pay the sales charge and end up with $1.4 million dollars more after 31 years, thank you :)

Becky,

It's nice that you can find a fund that beats Vanguard's index fund historically.

For the next thirty years, I am sure there is a fund out there that will outperform Vanguard's index fund.

However, are you trying to make a claim that this fund that has outperformed in the last 30 years will continue to do so for the next 30 years? You are still chasing fund's performance, regardless of whether or not you are looking at the past years, past 3 years, past 5 years, or past 30 years of return.

I can point to some guy who has won the lottery and said "hey buying the lottery is better than buying your index fund". Unless you know he is going to win again in the next thirty years, you should probably stick to index funds.

The reason for buying an index fund is not just based on past performance, but there is a lot of portfolio management theories that support it.

I agree that you can't buy funds based just on past performance, but you also shouldn't buy any old fund just because expenses are low. Go check American Funds out. Their expenses are among the lowest in the industry PLUS they have awesome performance. My point is just that Vanguard isn't the only good option out there and index funds aren't the only good option out there.

Becky, I'm a pretty active investor and the majority of my assets are not in index funds. I am mostly in individual stocks with a few mutual funds, most of which are actively managed.

That being said, for 90% of people out there, index funds are the way to go. Trading the way I do takes a lot of time and a lot of interest. Not something most people have. When you take into account that 80% of mutual funds don't beat their index in any given year, then you can see why Bogle is such a strong advocate of index funds.

You will always be able to find funds that beat the index, but at the same hindsight is always 20/20. Knowing which ones will do it going forward, that's the Million dollar question.

Becky --

I was going to respond to you, but it looks like Edmund and Double Journey took the words right out of my mouth. ;-)

Honest Dollar --

They both have advantages depending on how you buy. Read this and see if it answers your question:

http://www.freemoneyfinance.com/2007/03/which_is_better.html

I know people for whom even the overhead of indices is considered too much and prefer to own a diverse selection of underlying stocks directly.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats