Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« The Good News and the Bad News | Main | Free Money Finance March Madness, Sweet 16, Posts 13-16 »

March 17, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's unclear what Joe Lewis's personal net wealth is, but I hope for his sake that he was a multibillionnaire and that this loss doesn't wipe him out completely. It's absurd that someone with that much wealth wouldn't diversify broadly.

Same goes for those employees...

It is pretty amazing how hard and fast it all came down. This just shows that putting all your eggs in one basket is a horrendous idea.

Yea, I think that is the big lesson here... things can change very quickly and very harshly, so it is best to diversify.

According to the WSJ: "His $1 billion bet on Bear didn’t turn out to be as prescient as some of his other market calls. But Mr. Lewis still has $2 billion left (at least according to Forbes), so the loss isn’t likely to cramp his boating style."

(Cue the world's smallest violins.) He's still a billionnaire but that's still a really bad bet.

It looks as if a lot of employees with Bear stock were people whose bonuses (which are in large part made up of stock) hadn't vested yet. Hence, no option to get out.

I feel so sorry for the employees.

The lowest in the pecking order when we look at the rewards to the stakeholders and the hardest hit when it turns bad.

I remember reading articles in Fortune about families losing everything when Enron collapsed. I wonder how many families would be affected now...directly from this BS debacle. (Looks like Bear chose a great name for themselves!)

Joe Lewis should ask Ben Bernanke for a bailout for his share. After all helicopter Ben is giving his buddies at JPM a nice bailout courtesy of the tax payer. Isn't this was America is all about?

BC

I always tend to spread my investments between different accounts - some high risk and some low risk. I also Invest through different companies to spread the risk. I am sure that Joe Lewis would not have had all of his investents in the one company - someone that wealthy must have enough common sense to spread the risk!

Wow. It's hard to feel sorry for him though. He knew the risk.

My wife and I work at separate companies but both companies invest our retirement funds with the same mutual fund family. It's a well rated fund family with many investment options, but obviously that limits our diversification just to what funds we choose within this specific mutual fund family; we don't have the option to move the funds somewhere else. At least we are not required to invest in company stock, and we don't.

Needless to say, our IRAs are invested elsewhere. We're not as exposed as the people at Enron or Bear Stearns, but we are not as diversified as we would like to be.

So I have a lot of sympathy for the Bear Stearns employees, many of whom may also have little say in where their retirement money is (or was, unfortunately) invested.

I'm not unsympathetic to the two individuals profiled here, but the higher the reward the higher the risk, and vice versa. My guess is they will both be okay.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats