Free Ebook.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« The Only Seven Investments You'll Ever Need | Main | Sad News »

May 22, 2008


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I have a HSBC Direct account that earns 3.05% without locking my money up, and i think WaMu even has one that earns 3.35%, now this rate can change, but I just feel that locking your money up for that long is not worth it when these types of savings accounts are available. Just my $.02.

I use CD ladders for part of my emergency fund since I'm sure I won't need to tap into all of it right away. The benefit of this is that I'm still earning 5%+ on three separate CDs that won't entirely mature until 2009.

Laddering time investments (which include bonds as well as CDs) isn't a way to increase your yield; it's a way to smooth it out and reduce both rate-change risk and "need-it-now" risk.

The essential problem is that you don't know where interest rates will be in 4, 5, and 6 years, so instead of putting all your money in one 5-year CD, you put a third in each, figuring that even if one year's rate is significantly higher or lower then you'll still get the average return.

That said, as mentioned by Josh, I looked into CDs recently, but I'm getting 3.15% on my E*TRADE savings account (and 3.0-3.5% on my Salem Five checking), and CDs offered no compelling interest-rate advantages.

I understand using a CD ladder as a hedge against changing interest rates and avoiding having all your money locked up for a long time period, but there's no guarantee that you'll make more money by laddering vs. buying the longer term CD. Notice they say you "can" earn $270 more; it's also feasible that you "can" earn less money. It all depends on what happens with interest rates.

If rates go up, you can reinvest the shorter term CDs at higher rates, which would earn you more money (although then with 20-20 hindsight, one might argue that you should've put ALL of it in a shorter term CD to begin with and that the money locked up in the long term CDs is making you less than it could with the newer higher rates). If rates go down, the CDs that come due would be reinvested at lower rates, and (again with 20-20 hindsight) you would have been better suited to put it all in longer term CDs at the outset.

Bottom line, depends on what interest rates will do and none of us have a crystal ball.

I'm not saying one shouldn't ladder CDs - it does make sense as a hedge, but it's not accurate to say that it will earn you more money.

Why would anyone lock up their money at under 4% when several online banks have no minimum savings account earning that much or more? I think my E*Trade account is close to 5%.

Another happy HSBC Direct customer here. When I started out with them, my online savings account had a 5% APY. With all of the FED interest rate cuts, it's now down to 3.05%, but still much better than any other brick & mortar bank account or CD. The cash is always available and you can even transfer money in & out to any other bank account that you own (at competing banks).

"You can roll over the short-term investments into new CDs once they expire, hopefully at better rates",

The last four words are key here. If rate go down this laddering scheme doesn't work.

HSBC Direct for me!! :-)

INGDirect is also very good.they have excellent customer service and bill pay etc.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.