It seems that mainstream Americans are finally realizing that store brand products are often just as good as name brand items (or maybe they've known it all along and the press is just realizing it.) Anyway, here's a summary of a Wall Street Journal article on the issue:
When Summer Mills visited her local CVS drugstore recently, to save a few dollars she bought the store-brand facial scrub rather than the Olay version she normally uses. "I thought I'd be able to tell the difference, but I couldn't -- I looked at the ingredients and they seemed almost the same," says 30-year-old Ms. Mills, a stay-at-home mother of two in Ardmore, Okla. On her next shopping trip, "I'm going to buy the store-brand moisturizer and cleanser -- it's less money."
Retailers are also sensing more shopper experimentation. This fall, supermarkets Safeway Inc. and Kroger Co. noted that sales of their store brands are on the rise. "In this economy, customers are much more willing to try a private-label item, and we're seeing signs that this is happening more and more as the year progresses," Kroger CEO David Dillon said on a conference call.
To be sure, overall sales of name-brand goods are still higher than those of store brands. Still, about 40% of primary household shoppers said they started buying store-brand paper products because "they are cheaper than national brands," according to a September report by market-research company Mintel International, which interviewed 3,000 consumers. Nearly 25% of respondents reported that it is "really hard to tell the difference" between national brands and store brands of paper products. Store brands on average cost 46% less than name-brand versions, Mintel found.
Well, the word's finally getting out that store brands are:
- Much cheaper than brand-name products.
- Often as good as or better tasting/in effectiveness/etc.
And even if you're wary about store brand items, most stores offer a no risk guarantee. If you try one of their items and don't like it, bring it back for a full refund with no questions asked.
Given all of this, why not buy the store brand?
My prediction is that store brands will become a bigger and bigger part of total sales as people try them, see that they are as good as/better than brand name items, and that they cost less -- then keep buying them over name brands. After all, why pay more for the same thing?
We've purchased store brands for quite some time and LOVE them. They save a ton of money and are very good/effective. For details, see Generic and Store Brand Products -- Much Cheaper and Just as Good (Or Even the Same Thing!) as National Brands.
Pay attention to the prices. I've started noticing at Target that the gap is decreasing. I recently noticed on one item that I was buying (~$5.00) the savings was only $.04.
Posted by: Mark | November 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM
It has always amazed me that people don't buy store brand items. Often they are the same product! Or do we all think that each of these grocery stores happens to have a production facility producing copies of all these various products?
Posted by: | November 18, 2008 at 11:06 AM
I was thinking the same thing as Mark - that the gap in price may start closing as demand increases.
Posted by: Kevin M | November 18, 2008 at 01:07 PM
They're not always the same. I bought generic body lotion at Rite-Aid that has packaging nearly identical to the Aveeno brand that I normally buy. It's awful- smells funny, doesn't work well.
Posted by: Nirad | November 18, 2008 at 01:53 PM
It's hard for me to think of any brand name products I would choose over a generic or store brand product. Unless they are on sale of course. :)
Posted by: Eden | November 18, 2008 at 02:25 PM
There are many items that taste better than the name brands for much less. For example, the Food Lion label of vegetable juice is far better tasting to me than the standard V8, but the frozen pizzas are not as good as the Digiorno brand. Everyone has different taste buds, so this goes without saying. I have noticed that private label brand cleaning products seem much more watered-down than the name brands. Examine the pine cleaners closely and you'll see the difference right away.
Posted by: Mark | November 18, 2008 at 02:53 PM
This entry reminds me of the episode of My Name Is Earl where the ex-wife complains about how the kids get to eat "that fancy cereal" at Earl's house (the fancy cereal is brand name stuff like Lucky Charms).
Posted by: Bad_Brad | November 18, 2008 at 02:56 PM
I've often wondered if the store brands are just re-labeled by the manufacturer of the name brand. For example, ever looked at the jar of peanut butter and immediately recognize the fact that they can be the exact same size, shape, and style as the name brand?
Posted by: Mark | November 18, 2008 at 02:56 PM
I do a lot of shopping at Aldi, which is almost exclusively store-brand.
But I pay close attention to price. If I can get a sale/coupon deal that makes the name brand cheaper than the store brand, then that's the way I'll go..
Posted by: DW | November 18, 2008 at 08:49 PM
Can you buy generic drugs too? Where I live we can buy generic versions of OTC and prescription drugs (many of which can also be purchased OTC) which are considerably cheaper than the branded drugs. My partner had to take one drug for three months which cost nearly US$200 a month for the branded one, the generic version was just over $100 a month.
Posted by: AJ | November 18, 2008 at 10:19 PM
Store brands are key to saving money day to day. I grew up on the old "no-brand" products (the plain white box, block black lettering, two red stripes--remember those?). A lot of those were terrible, but it made me hate spending money on things unnecessarily. Nowadays, so many basic toiletries are indistinguishable in store brand form from branded form, it's really a disgrace to spend the extra money on the branded version.
Posted by: Sarah | November 18, 2008 at 10:35 PM
I agree with the general sentiment that I personally do not care to pay more for name brands....
That said, I think it's worth bearing in mind that, not too long ago, consumers bought name brands over store brands for the name. They were consumers. It was a matter of image. And as such, I can understand why that, despite knowing that it costs more and may be only for the name, they bought it anyways.... Fashion I suppose.
But this year, in our dismal economy, many are forced to try "something different" to try to save money. The question though I wonder is, will it stick around this time? Or is this just a passing phase for name-conscious "fashionable" consumers?
Personally, I hope it sticks.
Posted by: ekrabs | November 19, 2008 at 08:19 AM