The following is a guest post from Marotta Asset Management.
Social Security may be a Ponzi scheme, but it differs in one important way. Those who get paid early won't have to give the money back. Perhaps this explains why many people choose to start taking payments as soon as possible.
About half of all Americans file early for Social Security at age 62. In addition to their concern that promised payments may dry up in the future, many other factors motivate them. Some are behavioral finance mistakes, but others are legitimate.
Filing early exacts a steep price. Your Social Security benefits are permanently cut to 25% less than the amount calculated at full retirement. In 2009, full retirement benefits require waiting until age 66. So filing at age 62 translates to several years of early payments followed by getting 25% less for the rest of your life. Waiting beyond age 66 means getting extra benefits above the full retirement amount. Waiting until age 70 results in receiving 132% of full retirement benefits. People who file early receive about 44% less Social Security income over their lifetime than those who wait until age 70 when the maximum benefit is available.
Consider the case of aging rock star Capitan Danger. After decades of free love and rocking on, he finally began working steadily after he reached 50. By recording soundtracks for video games, he now has more than 10 years (40 quarters) of on-the-books income that has qualified him for Social Security benefits at age 62. At this point Danger has to decide if he wants to take retirement benefits early or wait until as late as age 70 to receive the highest benefit.
Studies show that if we refrain from smoking, exercise regularly, only drink alcohol moderately, and eat five servings of fruit and vegetables a day, we will enjoy an average of 14 additional years of life compared with people who adopt none of these behaviors.
Capitan Danger adopted none of those behaviors.
Although the average 62-year-old might live another 19 years, Capitan Danger will be lucky to survive more than 5 years. His body is beat up from his heroin addiction in the 1970s, and alcohol abuse has damaged his liver. And of course he doesn't ever pay much attention to the future consequences of anything.
Capitan Danger should file early for Social Security benefits. He can make his decision independently. Although he has known the love of many women, he never married any of them. One of the characteristics he seeks in a partner is her ability to support his lifestyle. Accordingly, his current girlfriend is years from retiring and earns more than he does anyway. She certainly won't need or be eligible to claim his Social Security benefits when he dies.
During retirement the Capitan has a disincentive to work. He must not earn more than $14,160 in 2009. Any overage will be taxed at 50%. That's fine with Danger because working too hard cramps his musical style.
He would have received a monthly benefit of $1,562 if he had waited until age 70. Beginning at 62, however, Danger will only get $887. By starting his Social Security payments early, he will realize $95,823 in today's dollars by age 70. It takes a while for the larger benefit that comes from delaying filing to overcome the immediate windfall of starting early.
Danger's break-even point is at age 80. He will receive the greatest benefit from filing early if he dies exactly at age 70. After that, no benefit will accrue in delaying his retirement income. He will no longer receive the delayed retirement credits that increase his benefit 8% in addition to the cost-of-living adjustment for each year he waits. If the Capitan lives to 82, he will have lost $20,016 by taking benefits early. At age 90, he will be $84,750 behind, and by age 95 his present hedonism will have cost him $125,209.
Sadly, Danger's hard living catches up with him and he dies at age 69, having used his extra retirement money as deposits on costumes and venues for a failed reunion tour of The Thankful Corpse, his former band.
People with shorter life expectancies and singles who will not be passing their benefit along to a surviving spouse are the best candidates for filing early for Social Security. Others are better off looking at other options. Women obviously tend to live longer than men. But Social Security does not discriminate by gender, so single men have an actuarial incentive to file before single women. Both minorities and poor people typically live shorter lives, which is also an incentive to file early.
You can see how critical it is to plan carefully before you file for Social Security. Because of all these moving variables, maximizing benefits changes every year as the age to file and receive full benefits keeps advancing upward. And it changes with every retiree's specific situation. But in each case, analysis begins with an estimate of projected benefits for both you and your spouse.
If you do not have a copy of the benefits estimate that Social Security sends out annually, you can request it at www.ssa.gov/estimator and then print the results. Or call the Social Security Administration at 800-772-1213. You can also get a copy of "Retirement Benefits" (Publication No. 05-10035) online.
Did you take in the time value of money into your calculation?
"Capitan Danger" probably wouldn't be investing any of the money and would simply spend it all, but what if you were going to live until you were 81 and you were able to earn some interest on the earlier money?
Just a thought...
Posted by: Tom | Easy Googler | March 21, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Good point Tom.
Also as I pointed out last week, there is a little known feature of SS where you can do a full reset of benefits up to age 70 by paying back everything (no interest charged) you have received to that point.
Posted by: indi500fan | March 21, 2009 at 09:24 PM
CURRENLTY, you can pay back Social Security with not interest and get a higher benefit. I would not count on this being the case when you retire, Congress could change this at anytime. If more people begin paying back to get the higher rate, I would assume this will finally hit Cogress's radar screen and they will change this.
Posted by: David | March 22, 2009 at 05:04 AM
Tom - great point and something I've been thinking about too.
Also, nobody can really predict how long we'll live, and our genes is one of the greater clues into it. BTW - out of 15 years life style difference mentioned above, 10 years is gained by just not smoking and most of the rest by not being morbidly obese. Everything else has rather minor effect.
This is just statistics, though, an individual case can be different. For example, 10% of smokers would get lung cancer in their lifetime vs 1% of non-smokers. But an individual smoker may not get lung cancer and an individual non-smoker can. One has to consider one's health at the time one has to make a decision, one's genes, how much one needs the money, what one will do with the extra money, etc.
Posted by: kitty | March 22, 2009 at 02:22 PM
Kitty has some great points. I kind of fit into Captain Danger's profile, but am trying to play catch up now that I am 45 and realize I'd love to be able to retire someday. Whether I will be able to is another matter. It's interesting, though, I have known several hard partying people who have outlived the ones munching on celery and carrot sticks all the time and led pretty boring lives. Only the good die young??! Flashback to Billy Joel song here... Anyway, guess it's like Kitty said - we just all have to evaluate where are at when the SS time comes..
Posted by: Mark | March 22, 2009 at 03:51 PM
Does anyone know whether the $14,165 earning limit is gross or net?
Posted by: funny about Money | April 04, 2009 at 10:43 PM