We've talked a ton about the following subjects:
- Where you live has a big impact on your expenses. Some cities/countries simply cost more to live in than others.
- One viable retirement strategy (especially for those short on cash) is to move to a lower cost-of-living country that is significantly less costly than living in the U.S.
This next piece blends these two issues. MSN Money lists retirement costs in 13 countries as follows:
- Buenos Aires, Argentina: $4,000 per month.
- Cayo, Belize: $2,200 per month.
- Maceio, Brazil: $2,700 per month.
- Medellin, Colombia: $2,000 per month.
- La Serena, Chile: $2,500 per month.
- Cuenca, Ecuador: $2,000 per month.
- Bearn, France: $3,000 per month.
- Abruzzo, Italy: $2,400 per month.
- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: $1,600 per month.
- Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: $2,500 per month.
- Panama City: $2,500 per month.
- Chiang Mai, Thailand: $1,200 per month.
- Atlantida, Uruguay: $2,300 per month.
These numbers include all living expenses you'd face in retirement, so they should be all-inclusive expense-wise.
One thing they don't have is a US city included for perspective. It would have been nice if they added in New York (on the high end) and St. Louis (or someplace like it on the mid to low end) just to see how they compare to the foreign cities.
That said, at least we can see the difference between the costs in the various cities overseas. Here's my take on the results:
- The top five cheapest are: Chiang Mai, Thailand; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Medellin, Colombia; Cuenca, Ecuador; Cayo, Belize.
- Why are these the most inexpensive? Is it because they are crime-ridden and don't have running water? Or is it simply because they have lower built-in costs for some reason? The answer will make a BIG difference when it comes to quality-of-life.
- FYI, I've seen a couple of these cheapest places on House Hunters International and they didn't really inspire me to live there -- if you know what I mean. On the other hand, they did inspire me to save more for retirement so I never have to live there. ;-)
- That said, those places are CHEAP to live in. Even someone who only has a bit of savings plus Social Security payments could likely live in these cities.
Has anyone reading this ever visited any of the places listed above (I haven't)? If so, can you give us your thoughts on the pros and cons of living there -- and why it might be so inexpensive to do so?
I haven't been to any of these cities but I have lived in a third world country. Before making such a huge decision there are so many more things to take into account than just the money. Number 1 must be safety, and a close second is the language, how many of us are comfortable learning a new language, culture, way of life when we are ready to retire... My advise would be to try it for a while before you make the decision
Posted by: July61 | October 26, 2011 at 05:39 AM
I have been to Jamacia, Grand Cayman, Cozemal, St. John, and a couple virgin isalnds. This is on a cruise and really not a good incidaction of the way of life there.
Jamacia I can tell you is there is alot of haves and have not. I did not feel safe there. The others I felt safer but wonder how it is outside the cruise line safety zone.
Personally I would move to rural america before moving to a foreign country.
Posted by: Matt | October 26, 2011 at 06:39 AM
I've been to Chiang Mai and Bangkok - on a tour vacation so I'm pretty sure I didn't get the "local" feel. My bFF spent a semester in CM and loved it. I would choose a spot where I could at least fudge the language a little bit until I got my feet under me, like a Spanish-speaking country. Safety would also be a huge concern for me, but I may be morecautious about things like that than others :)
Posted by: Jess | October 26, 2011 at 08:44 AM
Wow.
Apparently, "Cheap" is really relative! Most of those places are way out of my price range. The only one that seems reasonable is Thailand for $1200, and perhaps Malaysia for $1600. Anything more, and I'd out.
Posted by: BD | October 26, 2011 at 09:42 AM
Those seem really expensive to me, I would like to see a break down of expenses. I thought these countries were supposed to be cheaper? I can live much cheaper right here in the U.S.
Posted by: Josh | October 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM
That seems really high for Maceio, Brazil.
I rented a small but nice 3 bedroom apartment in an outlying suburb of Sao Paulo for about R$600/month a few years back. Food for two was about R$300/month and water and electric weren't all that much. Say that all works out to be less than R$1000 or US$570 per month.
You'd be living a pretty swanky life with another US$2k per month.
It's been 15 years since I visited Maceio, but it wasn't my impression that the standard of living there was any higher than the rest of Brazil.
Posted by: Mike | October 26, 2011 at 11:04 AM
I can personally attest that living in Chiang Mai is very nice for much of the year. There is a short period in April - May where the farmers burn all the fields and the air quality is unacceptable- basically you cannot go outside. Barring that short window, it is a very nice place to live.
Bangkok has better hospitals and health care professionals but it's a 1 hour flight / 7 hour / 450 mile car ride away.
You can live quite well on just $1200 a month, but it would be a somewhat basic lifestyle without too much international travel or imported things that cost a lot.
Then again there are many places to live in the midwest where you can live comfortably for less than $2k a month provided you already own your own place.
The Thai people are a very easy going bunch and that makes for living in the country a generally pleasant experience.
-Mike
Posted by: Mike Hunt | October 26, 2011 at 11:07 AM
I've been to Chiang Mai. I didn't look into real estate or the rental market, but I think a couple could easily retire there on this amount. By American living standards, it would be a rough living.
I found the people (mostly) helpful and kind. The food is extremely cheap and the landscape outside the city is beautiful.
Posted by: Terrence N. | October 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM
Really If anyones been to Thailand especially Chiang Mai you would know that there are a lot of ex-pats there, that it is very safe and the cost of living is very cheap. Great place to retire if you can handle the heat.
Posted by: Joe | October 26, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Anywhere, it depends on the standard of living you find acceptable. I live in Abq, NM, for $1200 a month. I live as simply as possible, philosophy + necessity. I'll bet I could live in any of the places listed for considerably less than the col given.
Posted by: jesinalbuquerque | October 26, 2011 at 11:53 AM
Buenos Aires is a beautiful city but I certainly wouldn't want to live --too much political corruption (& kidnapping of westerners, these days). You have to bribe everybody all the time to get anything done--we had to bribe people just to get to the airport. And Medellin Columbia--LOL! Be sure to pack your machine gun....!
Posted by: MC | October 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM
We have been to Chiang Mai three times where we stayed for several days as part of vacations in Thailand. It is a great place to spend a few days exploring the many nearby places of interest.
Living there year round however would be totally out of the question for us. We always visited at the time of the year when the weather was perfect, just like the SF Bay Area where we live, however as we are currently seeing they have Monsoon rains for part of the year and sweltering heat and humidity at other times. We don't speak Thai and certainly wouldn't want to drive amidst all of the various types of high polluting small motor vehicles in the very hectic traffic. The people are very friendly and being largely Buddhist are very spiritual and non violent, so we would certainly feel safe. They do have excellent healthcare available though still not up to the standard we currently have which is second to none.
Fortunately we enjoy a lifestyle that is perfect for us and since money is not a factor we don't have the slightest motivation to move anywhere at all.
Posted by: Old Limey | October 26, 2011 at 01:31 PM
Buenos Aires is amazing. One of the most beautiful cities in the world. That said, can you spell hyperinflation?
La Serena Chile is also gorgeous. As is most of Chile. Chile is very, very safe, stable (much more economically so than we are) country that has great agriculture -- so a good source of food. That said, you better be really good at Spanish to live there (although I have a friend who owns three properties but doesn't live there full time, but has $ for spanish speaking caretakers who translate for her).
Posted by: brooklyn money | October 26, 2011 at 03:37 PM
Also, that cost for La Serena is too high. I bet you can live okay for less than 2K, especially if you bought a place and didn't pay housing.
Posted by: brooklyn money | October 26, 2011 at 03:40 PM
I live in Italy in a more expensive city than Abruzzo. With a morgage of 600 euros a month and two teenage boys, the four of us live on 2400 euros a month comfortably. I guess you can live on a lot less when you retire so that 2400 US dollars is just too high I think.
Posted by: Petra | October 26, 2011 at 04:32 PM
Medellin is a lot safer today than it used to be. The drug cartel is down and Uribe is working on FARC.
Posted by: RB Boren | October 28, 2011 at 07:44 AM
How much would it cost to live in Trinidad & Tobago?
Posted by: joel | October 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM
You should come and see the Turkey. Turkey is still developing country. Turkey has fifth biggest economy in Europe just for now. But for retired people Turkey has great opportunities such as rich German people who are retired immigrated and lived in Turkey since 1980s.
Posted by: serdar | October 29, 2011 at 12:26 PM