Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Reader Profile: JR | Main | The Efficient Frontier »

May 02, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I recently adopted a pet and I think I'm prepared for the "14 to 18 year commitment" as my fiance put it. However, I never thought about increasing my emergency fund to cover my pet and I think it's a really sound idea.

When I used to listen to Ric Edelman's radio show on personal finance, one of his updates was on tracking the expenses involved with his family's (or his wife's, as he put it) new dog. He said he stopped bothering with tracking the costs when the dog ate his new $4000 hearing aid.

It's still a LOT cheaper than having a human child, and you don't see people weighing the costs of that nearly as much.

You won't need to spend nearly as much money with pets if you feed them right and actually pay attention to them.

I like JM's comment, it IS cheaper than having a human child and you don't have to deal with their drama!

We have a 3 1/2 yo yellow Lab. We bought her from a breeder for $900. She has cost us on average $5,000 a year (food, vet, boarding, toys). We walk her twice a day, so thankfully, she hasn't chewed up the house. I can't imagine my life without her, she's brought lots of joy to our family.

Don't forget the costs of the pet sitter or kennel when you go out of town. $$$

I'm interested to see if people believe there is a limit to your moral obligation to a pet. For example, I'm just not going to spend $500+ for my dog to get cancer treatments, etc. Does this make me a bad person? Alright all you pet lovers - let me have it!

SR,

Purely anecdotal, but I believe people are far, far more defensive of pet/pet costs now than twenty years ago. I'd be willing to bet that a far greater percentage of households have pets now compared to then, with an even greater number having multiple pets (especially dogs). I'm not sure why...but then again I don't like the "upkeep" and massive expensives associated with pet ownership, so I'm probably "cold" and "heartless".

Maybe it was Sarah McLachlan and those horrible commercials?

Wow, there are a lot of things here that I conveniently forget about when I'm seeing a cute pup walk down the street! My boyfriend and I have been tempted to adopt a dog for months but this is a great reminder that before we take the plunge, we should really make sure we're financially prepared to do so!

Here is a good tip for anyone considering a cut little miniature dog... don't buy it! The 'toy' versions of most dogs have been bred so badly that their little bodies cannot handle it and they have a ton of health issues. My parent's and grandparent's both bought 'toy' versions of dog's and they have had seizures, breaking bones and other miscellaneous issues $$$$.

I disagree with this post if you are buying a healthy full-side dog or cat, there are more than just financial reasons for doing so. We have 3 cats and I find that the cost of them (around $50 a month) is nothing compared to what they give us in return.

Having had dogs and cats, I can say that cats are MUCH easier to take care of, especially if you leave the house for periods of time.

Do not be discouraged by people who probably don't want animals in the first place and use these financial figures as justification, these amounts are worst case scenario and probably if you do not take good care of them.

As a twenty-something year old, a lot of my friends are beginning to get puppy's because they have their own places and think they're cute and that they're mature enough to handle is. Hah! Not only do those things take an immense amount of time, effort and care, but they suck you dry of money. I don't know why all my friends think that they'll somehow be able to afford everything that goes a long with owning a dog, but most of the time I end up feeling so horrible for the poor things who don't get enough exercise, time played with, or space in small apartments to really get the care they need. I know its nothing like having a baby, but for people my age its the closest thing too it, and who wants that responsibility?! Not me! I want to be able to take off to Miami for the weekend without having to worry about my puppy, that's what being young is all about.

Pets cost money, no two ways about it. Some cost more than others depending on the type of pet and how well you care for it, as well as factors out of your control. I absolutely agree that prior to getting any kind of pet, people should consider the commitment they are making, and beef up their e-fund.

Our dog has cost us TONS of money. I've never added it all up because it would depress me. However, the love and affection we get from him is invaluable. He will go anywhere, do anything (or nothing) and be perfectly happy, as long as he's with us. And he's still cheaper than a kid will be! ;-)

I think I spend approximately $20 a month on cat food and cat litter for our cat. Thats it. We had a dog that cost us a couple thousand within a year period. Mostly due to vet bills, but it was a pretty old dog at the time.


Income property is a pretty cool show.

Mark wagered : "I'd be willing to bet that a far greater percentage of households have pets now compared to then"

From 1983 to 2006 the % of homes with dogs went down from 42.5% to 37.2% Cats went up from 28% to 32%. Both hit lows in 1996 and rebounded. 2006 is most recent Census data I see on it. The average # of pets owned per household increased a bit from '91 to '06 though with dogs going from 1.5 to 1.7 and cats from 2 to 2.2

I bet the longer term trend changes are more about the demographics of households. The more people a home has the higher % of pet ownership.

The other expense renters don't think about is they are more limited in their ability for apartments and folks often end up paying more rent to rent houses because of the pet(s). In perpetually tight rental markets, this lack of flexibility can be a big problem and expense.

One thing not mentioned yet is that they are expensive but the benefits of pet owning has been heavily studied and the results are significant. Pet owners live longer, have lower stress levels and are less prone to certain types of disease and illnesses (mostly related to lower stress levels.) There are actually significant life expectancy and quality of life benefits to owning a pet that is well worth the significant finicial impact of pet ownership. See link on WebMD for some of the studies.

http://www.webmd.com/hypertension-high-blood-pressure/guide/5-ways-pets-improve-your-health

So you can have lower stress and actually be healthier by having a pet. That will save you money. I wonder if the savings from improved health will offset the cost of the pet? Of course a large bulk of the cost of pets is paying for their health. Maybe we should get pets for our pets to keep the cost of owning our pets down.

@Arimack

I doubt it's the fact that the owners live longer strictly because they have a pet. My guess is most pet owners are probably better off financially, which usually means they take better care of their health and have access to better health care. While I don't doubt that owning a pet can make one happier and less stressed, it's most likely minor factor in one's longevity.

Noah, there isn't a huge difference between pet ownership and income levels once you get into the middle class level.
For dogs : Under $20k income is about 30% and then from $20k on up it varies from 37-42%.
Cats is less varied, about 30% for under $20k and then 33-35% for higher incomes.

Jim, you are probably correct about the income not being a factor, but when someone makes a blanket statement like "pet owners live longer", that is simply not correct. Owning a pet will not make you live longer, nor is it a guarantee that your life will be less stressful. It's one of hundreds of things that CAN help prolong your life and make it more enjoyable, but it isn't a guarantee.

Noah, I'm sure Airmack meant that the studies show that pet owners live longer 'on average'. I'm sure Airmack isn't meaning to say that owning a pet will guarantee you longer life. I also don't know if the pet studies demonstrate any causation or just show a correlation. I think it can be taken as assumed that we're talking about average life spans cause thats all one can measure and so its not an absolute or guaranteed figure.

Classic correlation vs causation discussion.

I recently got a "toy" dog. A purebred Pug from a registered AKC breeder. While there have been normal expenses, they haven't been outrageous. Pet insurance and pet health inaurance are good ways to manage risk here. In the end you will want to have the extra money in case.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats