Free Ebook.


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

« Carnivals for the Week of April 30 | Main | Asset Allocation and the Efficient Frontier »

May 04, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I have had some similar experience to yourself. I have lived in 4 countries and worked or vacationed in around 40. I think many who have actually had this exposure are much less confident in the US system than those who have not. But not in the paranoid far right (or left) fringe way. We have simply seen other systems work well. It is difficult to ever be completely satisfied living anywhere when you know some elements are better somewhere else.

I am 20 years ahead of you though and have close to $4 million stashed.

My thoughts are as follows:
1. You say you don't know or care how much you spend on gas, food, etc. I think you should at least know your total monthly spending. You're obviously doing well financially, but I question whether $4 million will be enough for you to live the way you do now - although you haven't actually told us how much you spend, so I could be wrong. I know it is boring, but I still keep track of everything in Quicken.

2. I also question some of your statements about investments - the very rich having inside information for example. Or Old Limey and poor 20-yearolds having it easy. Are you sure you are not just paralyzed by doubt? Or feeling that somehow things must be more complicated?

If you doubt the future of the US economy then invest elsewhere, and diversify within the US economy. My own investments/assets consist of a house I live in (with a 30 year mortgage I will pay off as slowly as I can - my little inflation hedge), plus a condo and a townhouse - both fully paid for, and almost everything else in stocks - less than 50% in the US and a good weighting towards China and other markets outside the US and Europe.

Perhaps this time is indeed different, as you seem to think. However, I think you are a classic example of the recency effect. You are focused on the last 5 years, not the last 100 nor the next 50. People who were in their mid-20's during the Great Depression had the same types of doubts you have. They had lived through a period of financial turmoil when they were very impressionable and it affected their thinking for the rest of their lives.

I think we are simply seeing the natural maturing of the US - perhaps followed by a gradual decline just as Britain and Europe experienced a hundred years earlier. At the same time, we are seeing the rise of the Asian economies - dominated by China. But just in case I am wrong, I keep around 50% in the old and 50% in the new.

I believe that there are too many other smart people expoiting inefficiencies in the major developed markets and I don't think I can beat them, so I use index funds exclusively for my US and European holdings. Around 20% of my stock funds are in actively managed finds invested in Asia.

I love your statement about priorities and try to do the same myself. "You have to determine what your priorities are, and then take action based on that." Very few people actually live that even though they say the words.

How old is your wife if you don't mind my asking.

Hi WW,

It sounds like you are doing well and have some well defined goals. I would suggest a good retirement strategy would be to set up a portfolio of international large and stable companies that pay steady dividends. Many of these companies have income streams around the world and have some hedge against being only focused on the USD (which will cut both ways depending of if the USD strengthens or weakens)...

But the key strategy is to start the portfolio with a good starting valuation, and there are some ratios (Shiller P/E 10 for example) that test this. The trouble is that earnings have jumped quite a lot recently at the same time as there has been massive gov't borrowing and supporting of the economy- if this is not sustainable (and I think that is the case) earnings will go down back to historical levels and share prices will come down. This is why I believe it is good to not have all cash tied up into such a portfolio at this time. Like you, I am saving up and thinking about the strategy.

Keep reading and researching, there are definitely some good websites and ideas out there.

-Mike

Hi WW,

You're obviously in a great position. Congratulations on your success so far.

I think Mark left an awesome first comment. He pretty much articulated what I was thinking in a much better way though. I especially like his inclusion of the recency effect and the nagging feeling that "somehow things must be more complicated." It seems that is the money area stressing you the most (understandably), but it also seems some of that stress may be overly induced. The thing with investing is information is a double edged sword. You need it to help you learn but too much of it can lead to unnecessary doubts and conflicts. At least that's how I've felt sifting through the nearly endless investing advice online and offline. Everyone has an opinion and many times you just need to filter out a lot of it and develop your own investment philosophy. More important, stick with it. The K.I.S.S. school of thought isn't so bad really!

WW:
You have a problem that the majority of people your age would love to have. My investment portfolio didn't reach $1M until 1997 when I was 63 and 5 years into retirement.

In the current environment with some European countries teetering on the brink of disaster and the USA facing deep financial trouble in the years ahead, especially when you add in all of our unfunded liabilities, it is exceedingly risky to stick your neck way out and try to obtain annual portfolio gains in the mid teens. What you don't want to do is to take significant losses on any investments. A good friend of mine runs a small hedge fund and sends me his bi-weekly $1200/year newsletter free every month. Currently the ETF that is at the top of his rankings is THD (Thailand) but I would never dream of buying any. Between 8/1/11 and 10/3/11 it dropped 30% in just 2 months and then between 10/3/11 and 5/2/12 it gained 52%. That's incredibly volatile and not something that I have any stomach for.

If you take a 50% loss you then need to double your money just to get even again.

Hi WW,

You didn't mention what your expenses are in a typical month. You don't need to budget every penny, once a year is what I do and what I think should be the minimum. Also you didn't mention what you have in liquid savings unless I am to assume nothing based on your net worth report.

I'd first work on an emergency savings based on 6x monthly expenses. Determine your x (expenses) at this time by doing a rough budget.

Second, start a home fund and be ready to put 20% down. Use FMF's guideline of 2x combined salary for determining how much house to buy. When you are finally ready...go and buy a home. If you are not ready, mentally speaking, keep the home fund until you are ready to settle for at least 5 years.

There are other ways to hedge against the dollar and inflation. You can alternatively invest in REITs if you want. Also, invest in international stocks such as BRICs. Brazil has a nice ETF called "EWZ".

Don't worry about the insiders gain. Those inside Goldman et al. are in the 1% anyway and so no one will "pass" you. If anything should happen, you have your intelligence to fall back on and continue your success in life.

Regarding your money fears....I used to think in the same lines when I was younger. My fear had me pondering moving all my assets to gold. (i'd be rich if I had actually done that!)Money is just a medium, and we are temporary stewards.

Ever consider becoming an expatriate one day? Whatever you do, do not open a bank overseas such as Cayman Islands!

Call me crazy, but I didn't keep a budget during college (though I did know what my spending looked like) and I started keeping a budget after I graduated from college, starting out with a six figure income. I'm really glad I did because even though I don't spend a ton, keeping track helps to keep my spending low. I don't keep super detailed track, but it prevents me from just randomly spending $500 on an iPad without thinking about the fact that that would reduce my positive cash flow for the month.

I wouldn't say that at 22, investing is easy. You (most likely) have no idea how to invest at 22. I certainly didn't have any idea how to invest when I graduated from college. I didn't know what a 401(k) was or an IRA or what index funds were. Investing with knowledge of the systems is far easier, so I'm going to disagree with you on that point.

First, thanks to FMF for this series. It truly is nice to hear how others are doing and to hear your own concerns echoed (yes Mark, that technically would be confirmation bias but I digress..)
FWIW, here is some very brief info on myself so you can then judge for yourself any pros/cons of my input. My spouse and I are both 37, we have one child less than 1 year old, and our total monthly pretax income is basically the same as yours (we are in the 3%- you have a large amount to care about but not enough to influence any policy makers:)). Net worth including mortgage for a home that we will likely move out of in 5-7 years is $990k. I am not Jewish but I have always liked the ancient advice of (sorry if wrong name) the Talmud- 1/3 cash, 1/3 real estate, 1/3 businesses/stocks/bonds etc. As such, although not a perfect match our current portfolio (for the record, no inheritances) is 50% stocks, 10%bonds 20% timber ( I am a farm child from a rural area and have an independent forester so I am comfortable with this holding as opposed to traditional investment real estate like rentals), 15% cash and 5% physically held gold/silver bullion. The 50% stock portion is 30%foreign, which includes a 10% emerging market portion. I use the "core and explore" where about 2/3 of my stocks/bonds are index funds, and the rest is "active management". Current investment goals are to increase cash, resume saving for cash purchase of another timber tract in 10-15 years, and savings for our "lifetime final home" that I plan on dying in 60ish years from now. We live in a medium expense area- not the Rust Belt but not Silicon valley either.
As far as your 2 issues, here are my replies. Let me say your concern (?fear) were palpable in your writing. I totally concur and have empathy as in the last 3 years I have been having the EXACT same thoughts. I mean exact.
1. With the home, especially if you are concerned about inflation, focus your splurging and resources not on the the physical structure of the home itself (square feet, countertops, cabinetry, etc), but also land. In other words, in a million dollar home purchase I would lean towards a 1 or 1.5 acre lot with a "plain" 2500-2800 square foot home over a 0.25 acre lot and a 4000 sq foot home. Many FMF readers will concur with the lament, "I bought too much house". Conversely, you rarely hear, "I bought too much land with the house". Most agree, especially post 2007, with the "millionaire next door mantra that a house is a depreciating asset. I would not say the same about land.
2. Use your expendable (non investment) income, hobbies, etc, to focus on not just financial independence, but Benjamin Frnaklin like "self sufficiency". You can never go wrong with being self sufficient. Note I am not talking about a root cellar, a home bunker with potable water and a legions of guns. For instance, use your family income and instead of yet another stock, purchase solar panels. I say this not for an environmental stance, but from a self sufficiency stance. Political tensions and debts can turn off the Saudi oil pipelines, but no one (yet) can turn off the sun. If you like gardening, plant a small orchard and learn freezing. I cannot control the US Congress- but my family CAN control how much it depends on others. To echo Mark's first comment too, he suggests reviewing your expenditures to further widen "the FMF" gap between income and outgo to increase not your bank account, but your self sufficiency.
3. Last, don't forget to factor in family. You currently provide a mortgage to your inlaws, which is commendable. What happens in 15-30 years (or sooner) when a nursing home is needed? Will you and your wife be expected to foot a $4-7k per month (in today's dollars) nursing home bill? Weighty issues, but again, explore and contemplate self/family sufficiency. Health is always the first wealth, so form and continue a regular exercise plan for you and your spouse.
Sorry about the long post, but you hit a chord with me WW. Thanks again.I lack all the answers, but maybe we can learn together...Gran Torino

Interesting profile WW. I don't see you buying a home in the near future-it seems that your love of travel and adventure would preclude you from being strapped down. When I was married, we always owned homes and they suck a lot of money for the privilege of home ownership.
When it comes to investing you are fortunate to have such a vast knowledge of the world and investing opportunities. Hopefully you can use that knowledge and look at different ETF's that are global. The same goes for currencies and metals-frankly many Americans are pretty naive when it comes to global opportunities.
I do agree with your assessment on inflation-it's coming but in between global recessions. Continued success!

WW and his wife are clearly doing fabulous financially.

I agree with Mark's first comment.

You say your risk tolerance is off the charts but that 50% of your money is in cash. Frankly, that doesn't jive.

Personally I wouldn't feel compelled to buy in S.F. $800k is a lot of money and if you can rent an equivalent place for $3000 a month then renting is likely a much better choice financially. You can always buy a REIT if you want real estate assets.

I don't see anything about insurance coverage. So I'll add the obligatory comment that you should make sure you have a nice big life insurance policy for both of you, a disability coverage and a good umbrella policy.

A side point about employee stock purchases, WW said :

"We also both have company stock plans that allow discounted stock purchases, which we buy the maximum of $30k combined each year. This is generally sold immediately so as to diversify stock holdings from the companies providing the paychecks."

When I read the first sentence there I was worried. But then I read the 2nd sentence.

In my opinion this is the best way to utilize a company stock purchase program. You should buy it to capture the discount then dump it as soon as possible.

I was worried at first because there are a lot of people who will buy that $30k of stock a year and then sit on it because they work for a great company and have faith the stock will go up. Thats a bad idea for a couple reasons. For one you're investing a lot of money in a single stock and thats putting a lot of eggs in one basket. Secondly you're already heavily invested in your employer through your job itself. Think about the double whammy that people suffer if their employer abruptly fails. (think Enron or Lehman Bros. implosions)

It amazes me how many great contributors there are on this site.

@Mark, we don't track expenses closely but I would describe both of us as "frugal". There isn't really much going out the door on "lifestyle".

I've definitely been affected by the .com bust and the 2008 meltdown. The first time, I was caught up in it and holding a bunch of individual stocks. Some (thanks, Global Crossing) went to 0. I didn't have a lot at that point, but it was still an expensive lesson. When 2008 came around, I was almost entirely in diversified index funds and still suffered a huge drawdown (though only on paper as I rode it out), as assets that previously hadn't moved in tandem suddenly converged. So from this I've learned a) if you're going to be in individual shares, you better do your homework, b) diversification is not a panacea anymore and can't be counted on in tough times. It's the "so then what" that I'm struggling with.

@Mike, that's exactly what I'm seeing with some of the historical measures. Even if you don't take 100 years of stock history and take instead the post-Bretton Woods numbers, we're still historically high if there is a true mean established. If you have other websites / forums with like minded people I'd be happy to hear about them.

@Eric, I think you've put well one of the things I'm struggling with - what is the investment strategy I want to stick to? I have enough of a finance and economics background to understand the theories, but struggle to assimilate that into one of my own, which may be a personal failing of trying to do too much instead of "probably good enough."

@Old Limey, as mentioned the drawdowns on paper don't scare me emotionally so I'm OK with volatility, but as you point out rationally you have to double your way back from 50% losses, which is what I really want to avoid. If there were investments I knew could give double digit gains, on average, but I had to ride out huge swings I could do that without panic, but I'd have to believe it was the right path for the long term.

@Luis, a lot of the cash is sitting outside of retirement accounts right now. One of the metrics I keep is if I had no income, how long could I afford current expenses. Right now that's at about 5 years for non-retirement funds.

@Gran Torino, it's a great point about the parents. My parents are (fortunately) in pretty good position through their retirement, even if something catastrophic were to happen to their health. My wife's parents, not so much, so this could be a substantial outlay in the near future. We'll have to factor that into any house buying, thanks a lot for that thought.

@Jim, we do have pretty full insurance and a $2M umbrella policy. The big cash position isn't due to risk intolerance, it's more of a) holding out money from volatility while we figure out whether to buy a house or not, b) taking a pause from holding assets while I figure out what the assets I really want to hold are. My only concern with continuing to rent is that if inflation really takes off, in a few years that could be $5k rent while if I buy the bank is on the losing end of my fixed interest loan.

@GranTorino - good point about too much house versus too much land. Another way to do that without buying a large lot is to buy close in to the city. I would guess that in S.F., land is a huge part of the cost. I am in Houston, Texas and I paid $500K or my house at the end of 2009. The houses around me are being sold for $500K and then the bulldozers move in to make room for a new multi-million dollar home. So I am effectively sitting on a $500K lot with a free house.

@WW - I also lost around 50% from peak to trough in 2008/2009. But I stayed in and I am now ahead of where I was at the peak. I can assure you it was stressful, and I seriously considered going to cash near the bottom, as I know many people did. But now I like to say that both I and my portfolio have been stress-tested!

I still say you need to track your expenses though. How do you know what percentage of your income is being spent versus saved, over a 12-month period.

WW,

I have to disagree with you in that diversification is still key. You have to stick it through the lows as you are young but then when you get within 10 years of your target retirement you should start pulling out of the stock market. You can buy and hold index funds and then rebalance them yearly or semi-yearly to maintain your target asset allocation. This is not your typical buy and hold because it requires action and some knowledge, but it's probably your best answer to "so now what?"

WW
The only mutual fund that I own is BCHYX. It is an American Century hi-yield California muni-bond fund so it's tax free both California and Federal. You may be surprised to know that for the current 12 month period it has gained 15.34% with a maximum drawdown of 1.05%. It's hard to find that kind of return with that kind of low volatility. What it will do over the next 12 months is anyone's guess. I think why muni bonds have done so well is that people trust their state governments more than they trust the federal government. For one thing states are not allowed to have deficits whereas we all know that the federal government runs on huge deficits.

If you need to examine its graph you must be sure that it is adjusted for the monthly interest that arrives on the last day of each month. The interest accounts for about 4.8% of the 12 month gain.

I actually have this fund in my IRA which is rather unconventional since IRAs are already tax deferred. I use the fund to accumulate interest during the year and then use it to make my mandatory required redemption (MRD) and tax witholdings as I move the MRD money from my IRA into our taxable account.

Congratulations! Your financial status is indeed in an excellent position. Though I suggest you need to determine how much you are spending on gas, food, groceries, and others.

@WW, check out Dividend Monk for some great write ups on dividend paying stocks...

Besides the P/E 10 also take a look at the historical values of another metric called Tobin's Q- it is a ratio of stock price to book value. By that metric the market is still valued over the mean of historical standards, so statistically that means expected returns will be lower.

Old Limey really has a great approach but one that I don't have the time to replicate and learn, unfortunately.

-Mike

The comments to this entry are closed.

Start a Blog


Disclaimer


  • Any information shared on Free Money Finance does not constitute financial advice. The Website is intended to provide general information only and does not attempt to give you advice that relates to your specific circumstances. You are advised to discuss your specific requirements with an independent financial adviser. Per FTC guidelines, this website may be compensated by companies mentioned through advertising, affiliate programs or otherwise. All posts are © 2005-2012, Free Money Finance.

Stats