Money magazine lists six rookie landlord mistakes as follows:
No. 1: Underestimating costs
No. 2: Breaking the law
No. 3: Skimping on vetting prospective tenants
No. 4: Ignoring renters insurance policies
No. 5: Failing to check out the property regularly
No. 6: Going DIY at tax time
My take on these:
- I always estimate high on costs and low on revenue whenever I look at a property. If it still works then, I try and buy the place. That said, it looks like I've estimated low on both costs and rents overall, so I've done just about what I've expected (I will get a rental real estate update out sometime in the future).
- Having a management firm takes care of #2, #3, and #5 for me.
- I'm not sure about #4 where they recommend requiring tenants to have insurance for their contents. Does anyone do this (or have it required of them as a renter)?
- I do NOT go DIY at tax time. As you know, I use a CPA to do my taxes.
Those are my thoughts on this list. Anyone else have something to add?
#4 is part of our form lease and we generally rely upon it to avoid payment if there's an issue where a tenant's personal property is damaged.
#5 is still necessary even with a management firm, they will not pick up on deferred maintenance or cosmetic issues unless a tenant complains (typically).
Posted by: elb | August 08, 2014 at 07:59 AM
My lease explicitly points out that my insurance does not cover their contents and it also advises them to purchase a renter's policy. I always point this out to the tenant when signing a new lease. I do not however require it because tracking that is an extra headache that I do not need.
My insurance agent wants me to require it and make them carry 100K of liability in their policy but I believe that is mostly to protect my agent's interest so that they could try to get that policy to pay first. I have enough liability coverage that I am not worried about the tenant carrying an extra 100K.
Posted by: Apex | August 08, 2014 at 11:20 AM
In my opinion as a landlord number 1 and 2 are common sense, and number 3 is highly recommended. I did not do number 5 in the case of allowing a dog in an apartment and it really destroyed the apartment. So, I have learned my lesson on number 5.
I am doing number 6 myself, but due to the income levels, most of the deductions for the apartment is not allowed even though the net-net numbers are negative.
Kenny
Posted by: Kenny | August 09, 2014 at 02:06 AM
Our rent actually includes a small renters insurance policy, but we carry our own as well.
Posted by: Katelyn | August 09, 2014 at 05:51 PM
When I rented in college, renter's insurance was required from all 3 different places I rented.
Posted by: Kayla @ Red Debted Stepchild | August 10, 2014 at 08:50 PM
In my lease, the tenant can opt out of getting renter insurance if they'd like. They just need to initial that bullet and understand that their stuff are not insured by the landlord.
Posted by: Joe | August 11, 2014 at 01:07 PM
My current place requires renter's insurance. However, the actual required minimum is just the $100K liability, which is clearly designed to protect the landlord's insurer (thereby turning the landlord's insurance policy into an excess coverage policy, difference paid for by me). Once you actually own some decent furniture and electronics, any renter should get insurance, though.
Posted by: Sarah | August 11, 2014 at 03:52 PM
Tenant selection is the most important. But, it might require you violate #2. For example, in Missouri you can do a litigation search on the tenant to see if they are prone to sue or have been sued.
Consider getting a personal umbrella policy, particularly if you don't have a separate entity owning the property. If you do a separate entity, you must observe good accounting (segregation of funds) or else that separate entity won't be respected.
Posted by: STL Attorney | August 12, 2014 at 09:32 AM